Análisis jurídico-económico de la cuestión de género: costes, fallos y paradojas

Antonio Sánchez Bayón

doi:10.26867/se.2023.v12i2.152

Authors

Antonio Sánchez Bayón Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26867/se.2023.v12i2.152

Keywords:

gender issue, gender paradox, neo-institutionalism, women's rights, cis and trans feminism

Abstract

A critical review is proposed here, from neo-institutionalist approaches (Economic Analysis of Law, Public Election, Constitutional Economics, etc.), to understand and evaluate the gender issue and its unwanted effects, such as the gender paradox. It turns out that the more gender regulation has advanced, especially that inspired by trans feminism (of socio-cultural construction and a feeling of self-perception), the level of legal guarantees for cis women (of a coincident biological and genetic basis) seems to have decreased. ), in addition to causing the perverse effect of converting the autonomy achieved into state dependency. A presentation of the problem is addressed here, with a historical, comparative and narrative review, clarifying how feminism has imposed itself, hiding suffragism and other women's rights movements. It continues with a refutation of gender fallacies, from the study of its production in the Anglo-Saxon and Nordic world to its distribution from UN-Women and the fifth generation of human, gender and ethno-cultural rights. Finally, attention is focused on a case of material transplantation, such as the Spanish case, evaluating the "undesired effects" of its recent regulation, in addition to proving the cited paradox. All this is completed with some conclusions and future lines of research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anderson M (1986) The Unfinished Agenda: Essays on the Political Economy of Government Policy in Honour of Arthur Seldon. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

Bagus P, Peña-Ramos JA, Sánchez-Bayón A (2021) COVID-19 and the Political Economy of Mass Hysteria. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18, 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041376

Bagus P, Peña-Ramos JA, Sánchez-Bayón A (2022) Capitalism, COVID-19 and lockdowns. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility-BEER, 31(SI), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12431

Beauvoir S (1949) Le deuxième sexe. París: Gallimard.

Beauvoir S (1963) La forcé des choses. París: Gallimard.

Benon Z (2013) Some praxiological reflections on the so-called “overton window of political possibilities”, “framing” and related problems. Reality of Politics, 4: 237-57.

Boettke P, Haeffele-Balch S, Storr (2016) Mainline Economics. Arlington: Mercatus Center-George Mason University

Boghossian P (2006) Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Bonnet MJ (2015) Simone de Beauvoir et les femmes. París: Albin Michel.

Brennan G, Buchanan J (1985) The reason of rules. Constitutional Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buchanan J (1987) Constitutional Economics. London: MacMillan.

Buchanan J (1990) The Domain of Constitutional Economics. Constitutional Political Economy, 1(1): 1-18.

Buchanan J, Tullock G (1962) The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Butler J (1990) Gender trouble: feminism and the subversión of identity. New York: Routledge.

Butler J (2004) Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.

Butler J (2009) Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London New York: Verso.

Butler J, Laclau E, Zizek S (2000) Contingency, hegemony, universality: contemporary dialogues on the Left. London: Verso.

Butler J, Gambetti Z (2016) Vulnerability in Resistance. Durham: Duke University Press.

Campbell D (1976) Assessing the impact of planned social change. Hanover: Dartmouth College.

Clavero B (1992) Institución histórica del derecho. Madrid: Marcial Pons.

Clavero B (2002) Historia y derecho indígenas. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.

Coase R (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16): 386-405.

Coase R (1960) The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1): 1-44.

De Lauretis T (1994) The Practice of Love: Lesbian Sexuality and Perverse Desire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

De Lauretis T (1996) Sui generis: scritti di teoria femminista (prólogo de Giovanna Grignaffini). Milán: Feltrinelli.

Derrida J (1967) De la grammatologie. París: Les Éditions de Minuit.

Fukuyama F (2018) Identity: Contemporary Identity Politics and the Struggle for Recognition. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Fullbrook E, Morgan (2021) Post-Neoliberal Economics. Bristol: World Economics Association Books.

García-Pablos A (1991) La prevención del delito en un estado social y democrático de derecho. Estudios penales y criminológicos, 15: 79-98.

García-Pablos A (2011) La prevención del delito y los principales centros de interés de la moderna criminología. Derecho Penal Contemporáneo: Revista Internacional, 30: 123-130.

González E, Sánchez-Bayón A (2021) Rescate y transformación del sector turístico español vía fondos europeos Nex Gen EU. Encuentros Multidisciplinares, 23(69): 1-15

Halperin M (1995) Saint Foucault: Towards a Gay Hagiography. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hayek F (1952a) The sensory order. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Hayek F (1952b) The counter-revolution of science: Studies on the Abuse of

Reason. Free Press: Blencoe.

Hayek F (1973-79) Law, Legislation, and Liberty (3 vols.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

Huerta de Soto J (2000) Escuela Austriaca. Madrid: Ed. Síntesis.

Huerta de Soto J (2009) The theory of dynamic efficiency. London: Routledge.

Huerta de Soto J, Sánchez-Bayón A, Bagus P (2021) Principles of Monetary & Financial Sustainability and Wellbeing in a Post-COVID-19 World. Sustainability, 13(9): 4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094655.

Huntington S (1993) The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3): 22–49.

Huntington S (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster

Johnson R, Zubiaurre M (2012) Antología del pensamiento feminista español. Madrid: Cátedra.

Joppke C (2020) Multiculturalism, in VV.AA. The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Keen S (2021). The New Economics. A Manifesto. Cambridge: Polity.

Koch M (2019). Elements of a political economy of the postgrowth era. Real-World Economics Review, 87: 90-105.

Kymlicka W, Donaldson S (2014) Animal rights, multiculturalism, and the Left, Journal of Social Philosophy, 45(1): 116-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12047

Laclau E, Mouffe C (1987) Hegemonía y estrategia socialista. Hacia una radicalización de la democracia (trad.). Madrid: Siglo XXI.

Laje A (2022) La batalla cultural. Córdoba: Sekotia.

Lamblin B (1993) Mémoires d’une jeune fille dérangée. París: Balland.

Lamblin B (1996) A disgraceful affair: Simone de Beauvoir, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Bianca Lamblin. Cambridge: Northeastern University Press

Lamblin B, Rodgers N, Thompson M (2004) Philosophers behaving badly. London: Peter Owen.

Laurie T, Hickey-Moody A (2015) Geophilosophies of Masculinity: remapping gender, aethetics and knowledge.. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities. 20 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/0969725X.2015.1017359

Lilla M (2017) Once and Future Liberal: After Identity Politics. New York: Harper Co.

Lindbeck A (1971). The Political Economy of the New Left. New York: Harper & Row.

López S (2008) El laberinto queer. Madrid: Egales.

Lucas R (1976) Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1 (1): 19-46.

Mackinnon C (1989) Towards a feminist theory of State. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.

Mackinnon C (1993) Only Words. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.

MacKinnon C (2017) ButterflyPolitics. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.

Mellor M (1992) Breaking the Boundaries: Towards a Feminist Green Socialism. London: Virago Press.

Mellor M (1997) Feminism and Ecology. New York: New York University Press.

Menger C (1883) Untersuchungen uber die Methode der Socialwissenschaften und der Politischen Oekonomie Insbesondere. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot

Mermelstein D (1970) Economics: mainstream readings and radical critiques. New York: Random House.

Millet M (1970) Sexual Politics. Garden City: Doubleday

Mises L (1949) Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Nietzsche F (1888) Ecce homo. Leipzig: Henry van de Velde.

Ortega y Gasset J (1929) La rebelión de las masas. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.

Peacock A, Wiseman J (1961) The growth of public expenditure in the United Kingdom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Peacock A, Wiseman J (1979) Approaches to the Analysis of Government Expenditure Growth. Public Finance Quarterly, 7: 3-23

Peláez M, Sánchez-Bayón A (2012) Diccionario de Canonistas y Eclesiásticistas Europeos y Americanos. Saarbrücken: Editorial Académica Española.

Posner R (1973) Economic Analysis of Law. Boston: Little Brown.

Posner R (1979) Utilitarianism, Economics and Legal Theory, Journal of Legal Studies, 8: 103–140.

Romano S (1918) L'ordinamento giuridico. Pisa: Universitá di Pisa.

Rorty R (2003) Feminismo, ideología y deconstrucción, en Zizek S (ed.) Ideología: un mapa de la cuestión. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Russell N (2006) An Introduction to the Overton Window of Political Possibilities, The Mackinac Center for Public Policy (URL: An Introduction to the Overton Window of Political Possibilities – Mackinac Center).

Sánchez R (1995) Estudio sobre las libertades. Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch (2ª ed).

Sánchez-Bayón A (2010a) Estudios de cultura político-jurídica. Madrid: Delta Publicaciones.

Sánchez-Bayón A (2010b) Trasplantes jurídicos de la globalización: de las relaciones entre los derechos humanos y los Ordenamientos confesionales, Revista General de Derecho Canónico y Derecho Eclesiástico del Estado, 23: 1-21.

Sánchez-Bayón A (2010c) Au revoir, loi de l´État: el fin del derecho estatal de bienestar. Bajo Palabra, 5: 143-162.

Sánchez-Bayón A (2012) Sistema de Derecho Comparado y Global. Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch.

Sánchez-Bayón A (2014) Fundamentos de Derecho Comparado y Global: ¿cabe un orden común en la globalización? Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, 141: 1021-51. DOI: 10.1016/S0041-8633(14)71183-4

Sánchez-Bayón A (2015) Universidad, ciencia y religión en los Estados Unidos de América. Porto: Sindéresis,

Sánchez-Bayón A (2017) Revelaciones conceptuales y lingüísticas de la posglobalización, Carthaginensia, 33(64): 411-458.

Sánchez-Bayón A (2019a) Cultura democrática a juicio en la posglobalización. Cuadernos Manuel Giménez Abad, 17: 130-148.

Sánchez-Bayón A (2019b) Sociología de la identidad estadounidense. Porto: Ed. Sindéresis.

Sánchez-Bayón A (2020a) Renovación del pensamiento económico-empresarial tras la globalización. Bajo Palabra, 24: 293-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15366/bp.2020.24.015.

Sánchez-Bayón A (2020b) Una Historia epistemológica de los estudios de ciencias jurídicas y económicas. Derecho y Cambio Social, 62: 468-498.

Sánchez-Bayón A (2020c) Estudio de políticas económicas que aceleran la extinción del Estado de bienestar estatal. Derecho y Cambio Social, 60: 593-605.

Sánchez-Bayón A (2021a) Urgencia de una filosofía económica para la transición digital: Auge y declive del pensamiento anglosajón dominante y una alternativa de bienestar personal, Miscelánea Comillas, 79(155): 521-551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14422/mis.v79.i155.y2021.004.

Sánchez-Bayón A (2022a) ¿Crisis económica o economía en crisis? Relaciones ortodoxia-heterodoxia en la transición digital. Semestre Económico, 11(1): 54–73 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26867/se.2022.1.128

Sánchez-Bayón A (2022b) From Neoclassical synthesis to Heterodox synthesis in the digital economy. Procesos de Mercado, 19(2): 277-306. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v19i2.818

Sánchez-Bayón A (2022c) La Escuela Económica Española y su relación con los enfoques heterodoxos. Semestre Económico, 25(58): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v25n58a2

Sánchez-Bayón A (2022d) La escuela económica española. Aportación de la escuela de Salamanca a la Economía Política y la Hacienda Pública. EconomíaUNAM, 19(57): 164-191. https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.24488143e.2022.57.747

Sánchez-Bayón A, Pazos M (2013) Teoría y praxis de los derechos humanos. Guía para su exigibilidad. Madrid: Global Economist & Jurist.

Sánchez-Bayón A, Campos G, Fuente C (2017) ¿Ocaso estatal y de sus relaciones institucionales y protocolarias? Porto: Sindéresis.

Sánchez-Bayón A, Peña-Ramos JA (2021) Instituciones públicas a debate. Madrid: Delta Publicaciones.

Sartre JP (1947-76) Situations (v. I-X), París: Gallimard.

Seymour-Jones C (2009) A Dangerous Liaison: A Revelatory New Biography of Simon de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre. New York: Abrams.

Siebert H (2001) Der Kobra-Effekt. Wie man Irrwege der Wirtschaftspolitik vermeidet. Munich: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt

Soh D (2020) The end of gender: debuking the myths about sex and identity in our society. New York: Threshold Ed.

Thaler R, Sunstein C (2009) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New York: Penguin.

Thaler R (2015) Misbehaving: the making of behavioral economics. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

Quinn D (1996) “Boiling frog”, in The Story of B. New York: Bantam Dell Pub Group.

Valcárcel A ([1991] 2012) El derecho al mal. En Johnson R, Zubiaurre M (ed.) Antología del pensamiento feminista español. Madrid: Cátedra, p. 567-576.

Valcárcel A (2009) Feminismo en un mundo global. Madrid: Cátedra.

Vann M (2003) Of Rats, Rice, and Race: The Great Hanoi Rat Massacre, an Episode in French Colonial History. French Colonial History 4: 191-203

Volokh E (2003) The mechanisms of the slippery slope. Harvard Law Review, 116(4): 1026-37.