«Soft Collectivism»: An Ethical Critique of the ESG Regime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26867/se.2026.15.2.364Keywords:
ESG, soft collectivism, natural law, subsidiarity, spontaneous order, corporate social responsibility, catholic social doctrineAbstract
The ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regime has consolidated as the principal normative architecture of corporate activity in Europe. Academic critique of the phenomenon has been predominantly technical—divergence among rating agencies, agency problems, empirical ineffectiveness—ethical critique remains pending. This article advances such a critique from the convergence of three traditions: the libertarian ethics of natural law in its Rothbardian formulation; Hayekian spontaneous order theory and its economic correlate in the Austrian theories of dynamic efficiency and synergasia (Ravier); and Catholic Social Doctrine, from Rerum Novarum to Caritas in Veritate. The principal conceptual contribution consists in coining the analytical category of soft collectivism to name how the ESG regime operates: it subjects the firm through conditioning rather than command, hollowing out the content of rights without altering their juridical form. The mechanics of this subjection operate through soft law, institutional isomorphism, the spiral of silence, and the bootleggers-and-baptists coalition within a state culture that Bagus's counterfactual criterion identifies as indirect coercion. The convergence between Catholic subsidiarity and Hayekian spontaneous order—two formulations of the same formal structure—yields a unanimous verdict against the ESG regime. Against the bureaucratic simulacrum of social responsibility, the article posits genuine entrepreneurial responsibility—voluntary, prudential, subsidiary, oriented to real service—as the only coherent alternative within the converging ethical demands established by the analysis.
References
Bagus, P. (2024). The use of private property in a state culture. En S. Kinsella y J. G. Hülsmann (Eds.), A life in liberty: Liber amicorum in honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (cap. 35). Mises Institute.
Benedicto XVI. (2009). Caritas in veritate. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Burke, E. (1790/2003). Reflexiones sobre la Revolución Frances a. Alianza Editorial.
Chafuen, A. A. (1991). Economía y ética: Raíces cristianas de la economía de libre mercado. Rialp. (Original work published in 1986)
Concilio Vaticano II. (1965). Gaudium et spes: Constitución pastoral sobre la Iglesia en el mundo actual. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Contreras, F. J. (2013). Liberalismo, catolicismo y ley natural. Encuentro.
Crowe, J. (2019). Natural law and the nature of law. Cambridge University Press.
DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Epstein, R. A. (1985). Takings: Private property and the power of eminent domain. Harvard University Press.
Finnis, J. (1980). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford University Press.
Francisco. (2015). Laudato Si'. Sobre el cuidado de la casa común [Carta encíclica]. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Freeman, R. E. y Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3), 331-350.
George, R. P. (2009). La conciencia y sus enemigos. Encuentro.
Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation, and liberty: Vol. 1. Rules and order. University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1976a). Law, legislation, and liberty: Vol. 2. The mirage of social justice. University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1988). The fatal conceit: The errors of socialism (W. W. Bartley III, Ed.). Routledge.
Herrando Guibert, A. (2024). Praxeological analysis of ESG: The practical implementation of the stakeholder model. Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía Política, XXI(1), 69-106. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v21i1.926
Herrando Guibert, A. (2025a). Crítica al modelo socio-empresarial de ESG: De los síntomas a las causas. Encuentros Multidisciplinares, 80.
Herrando Guibert, A. (2025b). La ESG como arquitectura moral regulatoria: fundamentos filosóficos y consecuencias jurídicas de un nuevo paradigma empresarial. Revista Jurídica Cajamarca, (16), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17353743
Hoppe, H.-H. (1989). A theory of socialism and capitalism. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Huerta de Soto, J. (2004a). Estudios de economía política (3.ª ed.). Unión Editorial.
Huerta de Soto, J. (2004b). La teoría de la eficiencia dinámica. Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía Política, 1(1), 11–71.
Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management, 7(3), 297–317.
Juan Pablo II. (1991). Centesimus annus [Carta encíclica]. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/es/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp ii_enc_01051991_centesimus-annus.html
Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press.
Kirzner, I. M. (1989). Discovery, capitalism, and distributive justice. Basil Blackwell.
Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 12-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204272127
Lewis, C. S. (1952). Mere Christianity. Geoffrey Bles.
León XIII. (1891). Rerum novarum. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Locke, J. (1689/1960). Two treatises of government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—Our social skin. University of Chicago Press.
Oppenheimer, F. (1914). The State. B. W. Huebsch. (Original work published in German in 1908)
Pío XI. (1931). Quadragesimo anno. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Ratzinger, J. (2006). Diálogo con Jürgen Habermas. En Dialéctica de la secularización: Sobre la razón y la religión. Encuentro.
Ravier, L. (2016). Historia económica de la empresarialidad: Hacia una teoría praxeológica de la firma. Unión Editorial. ISBN: 978-84-7209-695-0
Ravier, L. (2020). A Redefinition of the Entrepreneurial Function Concept. Procesos de Mercado, XVII(1), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v17i1.13
Rhonheimer, M. (2017). Libertad económica, capitalismo y ética cristiana. Unión Editorial.
Rothbard, M. N. (1982). The ethics of liberty. Humanities Press.
Rothbard, M. N. (1999). Historia del pensamiento económico, Volumen I: El pensamiento económico hasta Adam Smith (F. Basáñez y R. Imaz, Trads.). Unión Editorial. (Obra original publicada en 1995)
Röpke, W. (1950). The social crisis of our time. University of Chicago Press.
Röpke, W. (1960). A humane economy: The social framework of the free market. Henry Regnery Company. (Obra original publicada en 1958)
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Harper & Brothers.
Tocqueville, A. de. (1840). De la démocratie en Amérique (Vol. 2). Pagnerre.
Yandle, B. (1983). Bootleggers and Baptists: The education of a regulatory economist. Regulation, 7(3), 12–16.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alvaro Herrando Guibert
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
